banner02

Program > Browse abstracts by author > Wehrkamp Carlotta Marie

Analysis of TE population in polyploid oat reveals subgenome specific activity patterns
Carlotta Marie Wehrkamp  1@  , Matthias Heuberger  2  , Moritz Feuchter  1  , Yannick Revaz  1  , Thomas Wicker  1  
1 : Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zurich
Zollikerstrasse 107 8008 Zurich -  Switzerland
2 : Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zurich
Zollikerstrasse 107 8008 Zurich -  Switzerland

Oat (Avena sativa) is an allohexaploid cereal comprising three large and highly repetitive subgenomes (A, C and D). The C subgenome separated ~8 million years ago (MYA) while A and D separated ~3.5 MYA. We analyzed over 22.000 full length retrotransposons belonging to four high-copy and two centromere-specific families. Out of these, we found four families to be subgenome specific. The analyzed TE families were active during different times in A. sativa evolution, allowing to study how they evolved in different species lineages. For example, we found two Gypsy families with a distinct activity pattern differing between the C subgenome and the A and D subgenomes. Additionally, detailed characterization of subgenome-specific TEs showed them to be excellent markers for chromosomal translocations that occurred after polyploidization events.
The Copia family RLC_Angelina is highly abundant in all three subgenomes. Interestingly, we identified two RLC_Angelina sub-populations one comprising autonomous and one non-autonomous elements. This demonstrates that pairs of autonomous and non-autonomous TEs can persist over millions of years. In the A and D genome the RLC_Angelina family went mostly silent before their separation and in the C genome before the tetraploidisation that brought together the C and D genomes ~1.5. MYA. (CCDD).
In addition, we identified the Gypsy family RLG_Cereba in the centromeres of the A and D subgenomes while we found a different family, RLG_Ava, to dominate the C subgenome centromeres. Interestingly, the RLG_Cereba family was absent in the C subgenome and vice versa for the RLG_Ava family. This suggests a competition between centromere specific retrotransposon families.
Surprisingly, we found no evidence of TEs specifically activated after polyploidisation events. On the contrary, we identified TE families that were highly active before the polyploidisation events, but went silent after. This challenges the notion that polyploidization is followed by a “genomic shock”. 


Online user: 18 Privacy
Loading...